Literally true in Japanese. The color of water is 水色 (mizu-iro: lit. "water-color.") The analogy then proceeds in the other direction: light blue things are considered "water-colored", rather than water being "light" "blue".
Technically, 水色 appears in both Japanese and Japanese-English dictionaries, so I'd say it's a word by any reasonable definition. (Disclaimer: not a native speaker.)
It's a word in its own right - but the etymology of it is still important and I feel it was slightly misrepresented.
For example, the greeting many people know 「こんにちは」 (konnichiwa) is a word in its own right nowadays, but is really just the beginning of an older greeting: 今日は御機嫌いかがですか
Dropping の can create a different meaning. For example, 日本料理 (Japanese cuisine) and 日本の料理 (cooking in Japan, which could well be used to refer to the quality of the italian or chinese food here). The former is truly a single word and the latter two words separated by a particle.
Literally true in Japanese. The color of water is 水色 (mizu-iro: lit. "water-color.") The analogy then proceeds in the other direction: light blue things are considered "water-colored", rather than water being "light" "blue".