> It's free for any genuine Windows 7 or 8 user, and $99 to $199 for anyone else.
It's free ONLY if you get it in their window (1 year I think) it just seems unnecessarily complicated when they should just make it free. Also they have 3-4 more SKUs than just Home and Pro (which really should only be 1).
> Windows 10 is supposed to be the last Windows release of this kind
I'll believe that when I see it also there is nothing I've seen so far to imply all further updates would be free.
Why should microsoft just make their primary commercial product free for everyone? I am curious to know what percentage of MS profit is from OS sales, but I assume it's very high?
Apple can make their OS free cause they make money on the hardware, which 99% of people buy from them to run the OS on.
And of course linux and other open source is another story.
I don't think microsoft makes that much money from customers buying their OS directly, but rather from OEMs installing Windows by default on the laptops/desktops they are selling.
Never once have I met a person buying a standalone windows upgrade/windows OS. Either they end up buying a new computer, they stick with whatever was installed on their computer (hello, XP/Vista users), or they illegally download the upgrades.
They definitely sell retail copies of Windows, and someone must be buying them, or else I can't imagine the retailers would bother stocking them.
For example, a good amount of the people that have Macs also need to run Windows virtual machines (or Bootcamp), and the primary way to do that is to buy a retail copy of Windows. I can't imagine that's a very high percentage of revenue, but I wouldn't say that nobody buys Windows directly.
If you illegally download upgrades, then you're almost certainly infecting your computer with significant malware.
Do people not care about this?
I'm not a big Windows fan (I've run Linux as my primary OS for years), but I've bought several Windows OS packages over the years for work (testing software).
It's free ONLY if you get it in their window (1 year I think) it just seems unnecessarily complicated when they should just make it free. Also they have 3-4 more SKUs than just Home and Pro (which really should only be 1).
> Windows 10 is supposed to be the last Windows release of this kind
I'll believe that when I see it also there is nothing I've seen so far to imply all further updates would be free.