Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The original source paper is at http://arxiv.org/pdf/1404.1951.pdf

Much as this sort of thing makes me glad I don't need to purchase private health insurance, the article would be a lot more helpful if it distinguished more clearly between what is and isn't legal use of the data as well as between the Experians and Google Analytics of this world.

That said, the original source paper probably if any thing plays down the potential concerns, contending, for example that a URI like http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21722252 contains no symptom-specific information when any sufficiently motivated actor can write a scraper that links anonymous looking URIs on healthcare domains to conditions and symptoms referenced in the page content.



this sort of thing makes me glad I don't need to purchase private health insurance

Are you in the USA? Thanks to Obamacare your medical history doesn't matter anymore. I purchase my own insurance and only three things matter:

   your age

   your gender

   the type of coverage (bronze, silver, gold, etc)
It doesn't even matter whether you're single or married or have kids. My family policy cost is exactly the sum of:

   my policy cost based on age and gender

   my wife's policy cost based on age and gender

   each of my children's policy costs (I don't
   remember if age or gender matter, I don't think
   they do)
I generally don't like the idea of Obamacare, but in this case it did a lot of good. Before Obamacare, insurance companies went out of their way to simply not offer private coverage at all to people with any medical issues, even minor ones. They can't do that anymore.


They actually can't charge different premiums based on gender (this rule took effect in 2014).

They can charge tobacco users higher premiums in many states (there is a federal limit of 50% more, but states can impose a lower limit, and some do).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: