Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think that needing disk parallelism because you have a workload that demands table scans and maintaining indexes is impractical due to dynamism in the data is one feature.

Another is not having pockets deep enough to solve it with intellectual property, either in the form of a parallel proprietary rdbs (spensive) or the need to implement clever stuff.

Big data as a technology is about dumb as brick, cheap as chips, brute force.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: