You conveniently elided the part that says "(criminal law)" before that. Who's the one being intellectually dishonest here?
> and "an evil act not necessarily punishable by law" ... my uses passes BOTH
Great, you made a value judgment. I disagree with your value judgment. I don't think Microsoft's actions were evil enough to be called crimes.
You conveniently elided the part that says "(criminal law)" before that. Who's the one being intellectually dishonest here?
> and "an evil act not necessarily punishable by law" ... my uses passes BOTH
Great, you made a value judgment. I disagree with your value judgment. I don't think Microsoft's actions were evil enough to be called crimes.