>high-end journals solicit multiple reviews. It is sometimes possible to fool many (but not all) of the experts.
I thought this was a debated point. Don't a lot of people assert that the prestigious high end journals don't really review them for correctness etc, but instead focus on how "ground-breaking" or "news worthy" ??
Experts are sometimes necessary to identify and translate the papers into something that you can understand—include whether it's ground-breaking or news-worthy.
I thought this was a debated point. Don't a lot of people assert that the prestigious high end journals don't really review them for correctness etc, but instead focus on how "ground-breaking" or "news worthy" ??