Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

considering the amount of people biking vs the amount of people in cars, I'd guess that biking is the far more dangerous mode of transport.

According to this site [1], biking accounts for 1% of trips, but 2% of traffic fatalities.

[1] - http://www.bicyclinginfo.org/facts/crash-facts.cfm



You might find this interesting:

  UK figures show that it takes at least 8000 years of
  average cycling to produce one clinically severe head
  injury and 22,000 years for one death.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycle_helmet#Health_benefits...


So? From the cited article giving that stat - "a mile of driving is ten times safer than a mile of cycling".

You might argue that cycling is safe. You can't argue that it is safer. It simply isn't.


Cycling on its own is very safe, it's the cars that are dangerous.


True, but that's a silly assertion. Cars by themselves are pretty safe. It's the other cars that cause problems. Since the cars are there, biking is more dangerous than being in another car.


> Cars by themselves are pretty safe. It's the other cars that cause problems.

Tell that to Michael Hastings, I'm sure he'll be thrilled to hear the news.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: