That's too bad. I personally found the second half quite interesting.
> even more precious to hear him refer to the telephone as the first virtual reality technology. What the hell is that supposed to mean?!
Being able to have a conversation with someone miles away. That is revolutionary. They are "virtually" there.
Well, why not the daguerrotype? But my real question is, what value is there in making that distinction?
It doesn't update in real time.
To go back to your Starcraft example, that is why Starcraft is a game, and the screenshots on the box are not.
> what value is there in making that distinction?
To most people it's a novel way of thinking about it.
That's too bad. I personally found the second half quite interesting.
> even more precious to hear him refer to the telephone as the first virtual reality technology. What the hell is that supposed to mean?!
Being able to have a conversation with someone miles away. That is revolutionary. They are "virtually" there.