I second this. But don't take my word for it. Here is 5.24 (one of my favorites) translated by Long:
"Think of the universal substance, of which thou hast a
very small portion; and of universal time, of which a short
and indivisible interval has been assigned to thee; and of
that which is fixed by destiny, and how small a part of it
thou art."
And by Hays:
"Remember:
Matter. How tiny your share of it.
Time. How brief and fleeting your allotment of it.
Fate. How small a role you play in it."
Very diffeernt styles but I'm not sure how I would choose one over the other. I don't know which is closer to the original.
Actually, I'm not even sure that's a consideration I'm interested in. I might be more interested in a translation that most efficiently communicates the intended message.
A literal translation, the Stoics having doubtless written in formal Latin, it being so concise, might appear more as riddle than prose to English speakers.
>Pierre Hadot's 'The Inner Citadel: The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius"
As someone who bought this book, I'd caution against a hasty purchases of it. I found it to be excessively dry and tedious. None of the original emotional content that make the meditations so moving is present. In the meditation you can clearly see - here is a dying man asking hard questions about life. In contrast the citadel book debates the various possible translations of specific words etc. Nothing wrong with it...just tread cautiously.
I will definitely look into the other suggested translation though.
Hey there, to the people recommending good books to "introduce you to stoicism" I would say: Um, the originals are probably the easiest and most straight forward philosophy ever written. Just read those.
I have a copy of Long's and it doesn't do it justice.
If you want to dive deeper consider Pierre Hadot's 'The Inner Citadel: The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius" - http://amzn.to/YuWyvh
I am also fond of these YouTube lectures on the Meditations: http://youtu.be/nLD09Qa3kMk