Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

While I think this is true, if you're conciously forming phrases they are by definition not intrusive, the subject of the discussion.


Yes, indeed. My argument is the intrusive thoughts wouldn’t be internally verbalised, thus such a device, in my opinion, wouldn’t be able to spell them out.


With me, they'd have 10 different things to parse. Some would be spot on. Some would be way the heck out in left field. And occasionally, some are totally obtrusive and definitely not meant to be spoken.

Thoughts are intrusive when they get in the way of what you are trying to get out of a thought process.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: