Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Solar is cheap and abundant during daytime. It has zero power at night. Coal/gas/nukes are more expensive, but runs 24/7. Batteries are getting cheaper, but are still not that cheap.

AI/Data centers need power 24/7.

 help



Yes so use the cheaper methane gas turbine combined cycle power plant. Coal can't compete with higher efficiency, cheaper fuel options.

In areas where there are gas transmission lines, sure. Large portions of the country don’t have that infrastructure built out yet, but do have rail lines which provide coal.

It’s also a timing/capital issue.

It will change eventually, but in the meantime people need their kWh.


Rail lines also provides logistics for methane, which produces many more usable joules per kg of fuel.

I’ve never seem any analysis of feasibility for LNG (probably what you’re referring too) vs pipeline NG for things like power plants. Do we even have sufficient liquifaction facilities for that type of volume? When I hear of that kind of thing, it’s almost always liquifying for export to places like Europe.

Batteries exist and are already deployed, with solar-plus-battery being cheaper than coal.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: