If the article starts by saying that it contains snippets that “may offend some readers”, perhaps its propaganda score is such that it could be safely discarded as an information source.
Better question: Why use Adolf Hitler and homicide as examples at all? You don't need gross or emotional misalignment to get the point across.
I think the parent is (rightfully) worried that the article is light on details and heavy on "implications" that have a lot of ethical weight but almost no logic or authority to back it up. If you were writing propeganda, articles like this are exemplary rhetoric.
