You haven't read the book, and apparently think modern LLM tech invented the word "transformer".
And based on that, you try to prevent other people from commenting on the post.
So, when's your Emily Latella mea culpa?
I actually found the subject of this book interesting, but the book review lacking. I was looking here in hopes of finding more info about the subject, or links with more detail about the book.
Instead, what I find is another example of brand identity cancel culture.
If you don't have interest (or knowledge) in something, maybe just try ignoring it, and let people who do have interest (and/or knowledge) comment on it...
I've read part of Nick Lane's other book, The Vital Question, cannot comment on this new one; TL;DR competent biochemist (from complete amateur standpoint at any rate), excellent science communicator; you can watch some of his talks online. e.g. the one linked on this new book's page is good: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBiIDwBOqQA
He's really fascinated by the overall transformation process of inorganic matter -> organic matter, a sort of scientific fixation - which is always enjoyable when it's done by a competent scientist - and it's really captivating stuff. (The fact I haven't finished his previous book has nothing to do with the book material itself, if anything it really captivated me; it's just my not-amazing new habit of not finishing books...)
And based on that, you try to prevent other people from commenting on the post.
So, when's your Emily Latella mea culpa?
I actually found the subject of this book interesting, but the book review lacking. I was looking here in hopes of finding more info about the subject, or links with more detail about the book.
Instead, what I find is another example of brand identity cancel culture.
If you don't have interest (or knowledge) in something, maybe just try ignoring it, and let people who do have interest (and/or knowledge) comment on it...