Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Unless you think LLMs deserve more rights than actual flesh and blood humans, yes. Either that or get bigtech to stop what they're doing, but we both know that's not going to happen.

> If LLMs get to do it, so do humans. If humans don't get to do it, then LLMs don't either. Society has embraced LLMs and bigtech is not going to give up their new toy, so it has to become okay for humans, even if you think this is unfortunate.

> Again, humans deserve more rights than machines, not less. So apparently, yes.

Man, you are fucking obsessed with LLMs. This incident predates the existence of LLMs, has nothing to do with LLMs, and plagiarism and ML training are two completely different issues. And, you keep acting like I am saying I think what happened with LLMs is fine, which I have never said at any point. I didn't say that what happened and is happening with LLMs is fine, only that it is a completely different thing that bears no relation to this whatsoever. Nobody mentioned LLMs. It's not a thing here. Stop talking about fucking LLMs.

> Yup, only serves to make the rich richer anyway.

The GPL is a great example of a copyright license that is explicitly not designed to make the rich richer.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: