Lets be honest here: you're not going to do that, because, as others have pointed out, the data is already posted...and you obviously have decided against the NOAA, without even looking at the data (because you didn't even know it was available).
But let's be charitable here: maybe you will "do your own research" aka decide for yourself. How would you go about that? Its a giant dataset, or more accurately, a giant set of datasets--probably way too much for one dude to handle...the NOAA is certainly more than one person big!
In fact, I'm sure you dont even have a relevant degree--after all, if you were a meteorologist, you would know what the NOAA is and does and certainly the fact that they post their data.
So: you wont look at the data. You arent even qualified to consider the data!
But lets be charitable again and assume you were trained in a field relevant to meteorological data. What would you compare the data to? How would you check it? You are taming the canonical source of data and want to "check it" against...what exactly?
See, this is the thing that is galling about the entire DOGE project and MAGA in general:
It is a bunch of people who are tearing things down because they dont like them. Not because MAGA can provide proof and "look into it." Nay, its just a bunch of underqualified people who are tired of made to feel dumb, because Western culture has moved beyond their small worldviews.
Lets be honest here: you're not going to do that, because, as others have pointed out, the data is already posted...and you obviously have decided against the NOAA, without even looking at the data (because you didn't even know it was available).
But let's be charitable here: maybe you will "do your own research" aka decide for yourself. How would you go about that? Its a giant dataset, or more accurately, a giant set of datasets--probably way too much for one dude to handle...the NOAA is certainly more than one person big!
In fact, I'm sure you dont even have a relevant degree--after all, if you were a meteorologist, you would know what the NOAA is and does and certainly the fact that they post their data.
So: you wont look at the data. You arent even qualified to consider the data!
But lets be charitable again and assume you were trained in a field relevant to meteorological data. What would you compare the data to? How would you check it? You are taming the canonical source of data and want to "check it" against...what exactly?
See, this is the thing that is galling about the entire DOGE project and MAGA in general:
It is a bunch of people who are tearing things down because they dont like them. Not because MAGA can provide proof and "look into it." Nay, its just a bunch of underqualified people who are tired of made to feel dumb, because Western culture has moved beyond their small worldviews.