AI systems should be able to do better. I don't think saying "yeah, we're done here" is acceptable.
The next step is to start building models of human minds (as is modeling human behavior, not literal mind uploads), as well as models of every self driving car model, and do full on global (-ish, limited to the general area) optimization of outcomes according to a publicly available and audited decision theory and utility function.
It's the only way to enable superhuman avoidance actions without making things worse by confusing others. This is why the models of humans and other robotic cars are needed.
It's in general sentiment I've seen in some places, not a literal quote. The article exhibits it somewhat, not explicitly explaining how the human average is dragged down by drivers that are partially incapacitated.
The next step is to start building models of human minds (as is modeling human behavior, not literal mind uploads), as well as models of every self driving car model, and do full on global (-ish, limited to the general area) optimization of outcomes according to a publicly available and audited decision theory and utility function.
It's the only way to enable superhuman avoidance actions without making things worse by confusing others. This is why the models of humans and other robotic cars are needed.