Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

<i>Currently, they are looking to quash competition on the x86 platform by locking down the UEFI bootloader</i>

You misspelled ARM.



Do tell.

UEFI addresses ARM, but also x86, AMD64, and Itanium (for whatever that's worth): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_Extensible_Firmware_Int...


Windows RT(for ARM) requires the bootloader to be locked like the iPad's is.

Windows 8 on x86 requires the UEFI on PC to provide an option to disable secure boot and allow a physically present user to add any signing keys of their choice. Windows 8 will happily boot on any hardware that does not support UEFI secure boot(most current PCs) and will also boot without any complaints if Secure Boot is disabled by the user.

Note: The above requirement is only to get the hardware Windows 8 certified. Microsoft is legally prohibited from requiring anything from the PC OEMs.

Why is there SO much confusion around this in these parts? I see these exact type of back and forth arguments and utter confusion in almost every discussion related to UEFI or secure boot .




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: