You're right she wasn't fired. It was implied it might happen only. I misread:
> she would be placed on administrative leave, and that he was instituting perhaps unprecedented proceedings to revoke her tenure.
They are at different institutions. I meant that her claim at her own institution about misogyny seems like lashing out. She falsified data, the evidence is fairly convincing. But in a broader picture, in the media, she has gotten more scrutiny and flak than Ariely, that's what I meant.
> she would be placed on administrative leave, and that he was instituting perhaps unprecedented proceedings to revoke her tenure.
They are at different institutions. I meant that her claim at her own institution about misogyny seems like lashing out. She falsified data, the evidence is fairly convincing. But in a broader picture, in the media, she has gotten more scrutiny and flak than Ariely, that's what I meant.