I don't speak whatever incoherent, irrational language you're using.
None of what you've said is relevant. The same or similar processes the brain uses are at work here.
> This argument is absurd and is based on the flawed notion that software has "equal rights" to humans,
The people who run the software have the same "equal rights" as humans. If you're allowed to download one of those images and look at it, they're allowed to download it and train their software with it.
You're trying to invent new intellectual property rights out of thin air. No thanks, we already have more than enough of that lunacy.
None of what you've said is relevant. The same or similar processes the brain uses are at work here.
> This argument is absurd and is based on the flawed notion that software has "equal rights" to humans,
The people who run the software have the same "equal rights" as humans. If you're allowed to download one of those images and look at it, they're allowed to download it and train their software with it.
You're trying to invent new intellectual property rights out of thin air. No thanks, we already have more than enough of that lunacy.