The information about Glebe Gate is contradictory.
> This was a lawsuit about copyright infringement
and then their replies mention that they were defending their trademark.
It appears that it was trademark related and not about copyright infringement which to my mind is far more acceptable. Companies have to defend their trademarks to keep them "active", but copyright infringement can be ignored by the owners if they wish.
> This was a lawsuit about copyright infringement
and then their replies mention that they were defending their trademark.
It appears that it was trademark related and not about copyright infringement which to my mind is far more acceptable. Companies have to defend their trademarks to keep them "active", but copyright infringement can be ignored by the owners if they wish.