Rather surprising to see Tyler Cowen making an anti-capitalist argument: AI is after all just a form of fixed capital, in the same way that a machine tool is.
The "unowned" argument is obviously not something that should be given the time of day, since valuable capital assets that require energy inputs are always going to have an owner, but it might raise more serious jurisdiction questions as to what law applies to an AI and content put out by AI.
The "unowned" argument is obviously not something that should be given the time of day, since valuable capital assets that require energy inputs are always going to have an owner, but it might raise more serious jurisdiction questions as to what law applies to an AI and content put out by AI.