This is one of those things that didn't exist before LLMs. Unlike AI agents, people usually form an informed opinion of things and don't hallucinate facts with great confidence.
Pretty astounding that all these people had LLMs back then and didn't release them. It's also crazy that the rabbi was talking with an LLM back then. The folk story precedes modern computers. How did he run inference? There are probably many such secrets in our ancient ancestors' pasts. Who knows how many h100s they had back then?
I watched some cable news channels once at a friend's. It appears they have already embraced the AI revolution since they had newscasters reading things that seemed unlikely and which I later confirmed to be untrue. The only conclusion is that LLMs hallucinated the text and AI-generated newscasters read it.
Humans would never make the mistakes these guys did. I think we should regulate this news that isn't factual.
I like the deadpan, but just to say it: when billionaires decide something is in their interest to have at least some people believe, they can find someone so unscrupulous that they will repeat the lie on air.