Nothing here is so newsworthy it justifies violating their standards.
I understand sometimes papers have to make hard calls. An important source demands anonymity. A tyrant is threatening to murder family. An election can be swayed by important but misleading info.
Nothing in this article falls into that category.
It’s not even a new position of the French president.
I understand sometimes papers have to make hard calls. An important source demands anonymity. A tyrant is threatening to murder family. An election can be swayed by important but misleading info.
Nothing in this article falls into that category.
It’s not even a new position of the French president.