Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

A higher bit rate lets you digitally process audio without introducing artifacts. It's very common to record, mix, and master audio at 192/24 and even oversample well above 192k.

It has nothing to do with snake oil or hearing things above 22k it's about not introducing aliasing and other digital artifacts, and on highly dynamic content like classical can definitely be heard in the audible spectrum.



I am all for 24 bit to get more dynamic range. But I am still unconvinced that anything above 48kHz makes a difference for the final consumer.


Wouldn't you get more artifacts downsampling a 192k mix to AAC as opposed to just using an AAC-optimised file from the start?




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: