You're ignoring the fact that ChatGPT isn't trained to be correct or logical, it's trained to be semantically understandable and coherent. Which is an absolutely terrible model to rely on in a court room.
Mate I'm not stupid. It was a proof of concept and even if the end result was going to be a spectacular failure, it doesn't exclude the fact that the bar associations are desperately trying to fight this tooth and nail.
Learn to read between the lines, not everything is an IDE.
My point is you're ignoring the fact that the bar association has a distinct interest in having the courts run smoothly and making sure lawyers in court are competent. So it is highly in their interest for a courtroom to not become a mockery because of a chatbot.
Not everything associations like the bar does is in bad faith or contrary to the public's interest.
The court system's smoothness or lack thereof is the responsibility of the country's judiciary IE the government. The bar associations for each state in contrast:
-Licenses attorneys and regulates the profession and practice of law in their -respective states
-Enforces Rules of Professional Conduct for attorneys
-Disciplines attorneys who violate rules and laws
-Administers the California Bar Exam
-Advances access to justice
-Promotes diversity and inclusion in the legal system
EG they're trade unions and they're going to become the luddites of the 21st century.
