I disagree, this article did not come off this way to me, as all the comments were brief and backed up with supporting materials. In addition, the usage of words that would convey feelings the author had about the company were nonexistent — they described the actions taken (or not taken) by the company and left the reader to come to their own conclusions.
Agreed. The tone was objective and factual. It's too bad the owners of LastPass failed to heed the criticisms that preceded this incident. FYI for anyone carping about LP's legal liability here: read the disclaimers (and indemnification agreement) in their TOS (personal or business). It's a real howl, and pretty much software industry standard.
