Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

On one hand, I applaud this. Ads aren't evil, and rewarding ads that play nice would benefit everyone involved. And, it's just an option that can be disabled.

All that being said, I see this ending badly for ABP. It won't be long until someone creates a version that blocks all ads again by default.



"It won't be long until someone creates a version that blocks all ads again by default."

This version will still be able to block all ads. By does it matter if it's by default?


Because the vast majority of people never stray from defaults, and will think that it's just bad at doing it's job.


Does that really apply to most ABP users?


Yeah, I would assume so. Its name certainly implies that it's meant to block all ads. If something called AdBlock was letting through some % of ads, the Occam's razor explanation is that it's just buggy/imperfect, since it's actually a hard problem to get 100% coverage of anything.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: