By this logic you would never believe what anyone is saying because its always 'one side of the story and many relevant details might have been left out.'
So what must one do, go on living a cynical life where you never take anyone's word for what its worth?
But by your logic you would believe everything everybody else said - which is the EXACT behavior that put the guy in the article in the position he was in, by his own account. Assuming everything he says is true, he wouldn’t been “bullied out” if people had been skeptical of what his boss said.
So what must one do, go on living a cynical life where you never take anyone's word for what its worth?