A peer reviewed study? Come now, this is a profit seeking book. In order to verify these claims I would have to read an entire book. It’s preposterous to cite as evidence what is basically a novel.
> Even former critics must admit that adding e-fuels through PtX makes 100% RE possible at costs similar to fossil fuels. These critics are still questioning whether 100% RE is the cheapest solution but no longer claim it would be unfeasible or prohibitively expensive.
Anyway, I now expect you will apply the same level of skeptical criticism to anyone stating renewables are insufficient, and demand they supply peer-reviewed references.
