You might be interested in Lazard's "Levelized Cost Of Energy" PDF (https://www.lazard.com/media/451905/lazards-levelized-cost-o... , from https://www.lazard.com/perspective/levelized-cost-of-energy-...).

On page 15 note "This analysis does not take into account potential social and environmental externalities or reliability-related considerations", and that solar and wind do not get the checkmark for "baseload" -- only "intermittent".

Pages 13 and 14 show Fuel Costs as:

    Wind: 0
    Solar: 0
    Coal: $13-$18/MWh ($0.013 - $0.018 per kWh)
    Fission: $9/MWh ($0.009 per kWh)
    Natural Gas: $21-34/MWh ($0.021 - $0.034 per kWh)

As a retail consumer, I'm paying about $0.15 per kWh, though I know that includes transmission and distribution and retail markup.

Fusion has the potential to be very low on fuel costs. But the capital costs are an unknown. In my original comment, I tried to show that when amortized over enough kWh for sale, even $Billions in capital costs could make sense, if they give us a machine that produces zero-carbon baseload electrical generation at scale.

With fusion, you are basically burning the reactor. The actual fuel cost is inconsequential.