No need to get rude, I'm not some teenage
troll guy, I'm here for intelligent
discussion. I don't seen where I've
"proven" myself wrong.
This thread is not about investment into
nsa, but commercialization of nsa
(or other military/government org)
technology. My point was that regardless
of nsa'a official stance of secrecy, tech
gets "leaked" out into the commercial sphere.
You can't stop a good thing from spreading,
no matter how hard you try.
Are nuclear bombs good? Do the heads of our national security agencies take technologies that could potentially kill the whole world's population and, because they, like every other executive in the world, are an MBA-types, sell it to whoever they happen to meet at a cocktail party? You may not be a teenager, but I can't say that you aren't a troll.
Nuclear tech, in the form of reactors
has been commercialized for quite some
time if you haven't noticed. And no,
I'm not a troll, just because someone
takes a contrary view they
are not automatically a troll.
This thread is not about investment into nsa, but commercialization of nsa (or other military/government org) technology. My point was that regardless of nsa'a official stance of secrecy, tech gets "leaked" out into the commercial sphere. You can't stop a good thing from spreading, no matter how hard you try.