Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Sure. However, using the words "Tesla" and "crash" in the title of an article is a surefire way to get traffic. (Exhibit A: the conversation we're having.)

At least, the article is pretty factual, and does not had any inuendo about FSD. I would like to know who is conducting the investigation, though (how much is done by the police, how much by automotive regulatory body, how much by Telsa itself, etc...)

Thoughts go to the family of the people inside the car, and to the people investigating.



The article seems very factual and well-written.

What worries me are the comments on here. There's clearly a very strong bias at play in the hacker news community (regardless of what one ought to think of Tesla or Elon).


>However, using the words "Tesla" and "crash" in the title of an article is a surefire way to get traffic.

You reap what you sow.

Tesla created hype environment and now pays for the bullseye they painted on their forehead




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: