Sure, option 3 is to stop offering the products. But simplistically, I expect companies to obey these laws when it is feasible. I'm not surprised that they shrug it over when they have no idea what to do. As you say, when (or if) it comes to a trial, the interpretation of the law for this particular case will be clarified.
I think part of the reason why lawmakers made GDPR so vague was to not outright ban things which didn't even cross their minds (like GPT models), but instead let a court evaluate these cases in context down the line.
Of course it's not the best situation, especially for small businesses which cannot risk working on a product that might or might not be illegal.
Sure, option 3 is to stop offering the products. But simplistically, I expect companies to obey these laws when it is feasible. I'm not surprised that they shrug it over when they have no idea what to do. As you say, when (or if) it comes to a trial, the interpretation of the law for this particular case will be clarified.
I think part of the reason why lawmakers made GDPR so vague was to not outright ban things which didn't even cross their minds (like GPT models), but instead let a court evaluate these cases in context down the line.
Of course it's not the best situation, especially for small businesses which cannot risk working on a product that might or might not be illegal.