Sounds like a textbook case of contributory negligence on the part of the rider, with plenty supporting evidence.
It's a shame that he's paralyzed. But I guess that's how it works in the US - if you've lost basically everything, then you have no reason not to sue. You have nothing to lose and everything to gain.
It's a shame that he's paralyzed. But I guess that's how it works in the US - if you've lost basically everything, then you have no reason not to sue. You have nothing to lose and everything to gain.