More likely - some legitimate use cases will emerge, as I am yet to see anything to date that would fit into that category, but there is still room for the solution that is crypto to find itself a problem to fix.
ENS alone should be more than 10% of the market. Using NFTs for decentralized identity and authn is big. Unlock Protocol's is going for authz.
There is a strong selection bias for those that report on crypto for clicks or those that want to create a narrative that we can not live without some big central authority controlling our lives.
Have you ever thought about closing your Google Account and got discouraged when you realized that there are so many other services that depend on it? Worse, have you ever had your Google/Facebook/Apple/Outlook/Twitter account closed without knowing why?
Centralized systems are amazing, until they aren't.
Have you ever had your credentials to a decentralized service stolen by a keylogger and realized that you will never, ever, under any circumstances regain control and there's no one you can talk to and nothing you can do about it?
Decentralized systems are amazing, until they aren't
(Even if you wanted to have a decentralized account recovery like saying you can have 3 friends band together and help you recover your account if you lose access, what happens when those 3 friends decide that don't like you as much as they like the idea of banding together to take over your identity and all your money?...)
You know what annoys me the most about these discussions about crypto and systems in general? It's the fact that people can only argue in the extremes. Decentralization is a spectrum. (https://twitter.com/rlullis/status/1307420668372430848)
> Decentralized systems are amazing, until they aren't
No, they are not. They are expensive, they require responsibility. The UX is complicated. Most people shouldn't use it and will be better off delegating all this to someone else.
Thing is, it's not because something is good enough for most people that everyone should stick to it.
> what happens when those 3 friends decide that don't like you as much as they like the idea of banding together to take over your identity and all your money?
This argument is stupid. With decentralization, there is no reason for your identity to be something singular. There is even less reason for people to think that one wallet should hold "all your money".
A keylogger can’t steal your key if you use even the most basic security that this space advises.
If you don’t have any friends you trust (which is probably a pretty common thing), then you can choose any other people/entities you do trust. If you want to rely on the government or financial institutions, you can request that they be part of your social recovery wallet process.
This isn’t common yet, but you can also build your wallet so it’s very difficult to steal funds even if someone recovers your private key. Building challenge periods into your transactions is trivial and lets you know if an attacker has compromised your key. You can then transfer all of your assets out with your recovery key.
