Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why should somebody be allowed to keep others out of property that they are not paying for. I find your contention competent wrong on all counts.


That cuts both ways; why should somebody be allowed to induce a negative impact on property that they are not paying for?


Prohibiting others in an entire area is a far far bigger "negative externality."




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: