You praise HN because we can have "meaningful" discussions, yet in the next sentence you ask people not to upvote an article just because the author is not great at communicating his thoughts, and makes some grammar mistakes, completely ignoring the "meaning" of the article.
You feel the need to "urge the people" not to upvote it. However, wouldn't it be more "meaningful" to explain why you do (or do not) agree with what is said, instead of just complaining about grammar?
I personally found the article interesting, even though it's poorly written. Instead of ordering others around, what about urging yourself to refrain from commenting unless you have something meaningful to add to the discussion ;)
I’m one of the people who upvoted this post onto the frontpage, because I found it an interesting explanation (in a how-possibly, not a how-actually sense) of the popularity of the news about Basecamp buyouts. I was interested to read what people with more knowledge about this topic might comment.
Could you elaborate on what makes this post „noise“?
I have been on HN for over six months now and I admire how people here can go into deep discussions, unlike, let's say Reddit.
But it seems like there is a lot of noise on HN now, with poorly written articles like these, which I think makes HN less appealing.
I urge the people to not upvote these posts to the front page.