Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

There are other reasons for using lossless audio files, such as archiving, and avoiding degradation through re-encoding.


also disks are cheap, and flac amounts to a digital copy of the physical CD. You could decode it to the original WAV files from the CD if you wanted to


  > flac amounts to a digital copy of the physical CD
So long as your CD doesn't include any square waves, you're golden.


> So long as your CD doesn't include any square waves, you're golden.

Could you explain what you mean by this? Are you referring to certain patterns that fall within standard Redbook audio parameters that FLAC then fails to encode properly? Or perhaps to characteristics of CDs or CD playback equipment that are difficult to duplicate on modern-day computers? I can imagine something like preëmphasis being problematic sometimes, but that seems to have little to do with square waves.


I mentioned square waves specifically because I remember reading an article a couple of years ago about how going WAV -> FLAC -> WAV on 'unnatural' waves like sawtooth or square waves failed to come back out exactly alike. It was just a little sarcasm on my part. IIRC the article was on HN so I expected people to pick up on that.


That would be an encoder bug. I seriously doubt it still exists.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: