Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

We have two user-bases in mind:

- end-user developers. This is kind of like being a user of any other language, there's no EULA, nothing to sign, you just write SOUL code, test and debug it with whatever tools (which may themselves have a EULA, but probably nothing heavy)

- device and host developers: These are the people writing DAWs, plugins, hardware that can run SOUL code, audio device drivers etc. These are professionals, and licensing is a normal part of life when you're doing this kind of work.



The JIT for a language must be licensed? I was totally onboard and super excited before I read this thread.


sigh... The JIT engine in your graphics driver stack will contain millions of lines of heavily-licensed, patent-riddled code.

But that doesn't stop you as a developer from freely writing a 3D game that runs on it.

Same here. Think of it as a device driver. Ideally we'll open-source everything eventually, but anyone who's ever been involved in real-world commercial software development will understand that things aren't always quite that idyllic when you're building a business around it.


Which group would a DAW and plugins developed by a FOSS community like KDE or GNOME belong to?


We've been using a BSD-style license to make sure we don't stop those people using it if they want to.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: