Most press release about batteries claim a x2 improvement in 5 years or something like that. If they were true perhaps you can get a Nobel, but you must wait in the queue for a few years. If you break the Second Law you can skip the queue and even the voting.
> No power numbers. Are they talking about generating a picowatt or something like that?
The figures in the research article claims ~1pW. I still can't get the research paper, but reading the information that is available, and some enlightening discussions in HN I guess they measured a ~1pW exchange of heat in the other side of the device (the "lamp" in the animation). But it is ~1pW in one direction and exactly the same amount in the other direction. There is no net energy flux or "useful" energy.
This may be an useful experimental result in the research branch they are working, but not "Limitless Power".
> No power numbers. Are they talking about generating a picowatt or something like that?
The figures in the research article claims ~1pW. I still can't get the research paper, but reading the information that is available, and some enlightening discussions in HN I guess they measured a ~1pW exchange of heat in the other side of the device (the "lamp" in the animation). But it is ~1pW in one direction and exactly the same amount in the other direction. There is no net energy flux or "useful" energy.
This may be an useful experimental result in the research branch they are working, but not "Limitless Power".