Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Wouldn't it be the union of the licenses, not the intersection? Provisions of one license wouldn't go away because they're not present in the other?


I read it as intersection of the permissions is a union of restrictions. So, I think the point is that given the union of the restrictions, you get the most restrictive license in this case, the GPL.


Think "most restrictive", when he says intersection. You can only do things allowed by all of them.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: