To say "consciousness is inseparable from physics" reads like nonsense to me. You might as well say "speed is inseparable from cars", or "corporate governance is inseparable from office chairs". Studying one tells you nothing about the other, and mentioning both in the same sentence justs suggests you are confused but don't know it.
I mean to say that consciousness exists in the universe, therefore it is a part of the universe, therefore you can not take consciousness out of the universe. The set of all things contains consciousness. I'm trying to implicate the unorganized information process of quantum decoherence as consciousness, and the organized information process of a neural network as the mind. One can neatly describe both processes with what appears to be the same laws.
I reason that since a process which is described by the same mathematics gives rise to the mind, then with a slight tweak it will give rise to something else. Since consciousness is close at hand I plug it in and try to see if it fits.
Might as well try corporate governance, then, or fiscal responsibility, or moral probity, or turbulent mixing. Why choose consciousness to try to shoehorn into the physics? Are two things not fathomed better than one?
I have never heard of anybody using the Schroedinger equation to analyze either a neural net or psychology. Where do you get the idea they involve the same mathematics?
