Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>major US metropolitan areas that have gun control

They don't have gun control in the sense that the UK and most other European countries have gun control. You can even get a permit to carry a concealed weapon in NYC, for example.



> You can even get a permit to carry a concealed weapon in NYC

Ok, I’ll do it for you. Rural crime in USA is 2.0 - 3.5 / 100k in USA depending on region. Where all the guns are, the shootings aren’t.

NYC... for example... SHALL ISSUE state, you’re effectively wrong. Only the connected and elite can get carry permits in NYC. That’ll change soon with the latest SC case coming up.

You’re right, it’s not “the same” gun control. Like Paris where guns for private ownership and stored in your home are effectively banned, yet, worse mass shootings than any in the US ever. Or Norway where black rifles are banned, but worse mass shooting of kids than any in the US.

You’re right, it’s not the same - but what we can look at is IN THE USA, the places with the most gun control have the most shootings, in inconvenient fact.

Ok, so... by your argument. It’s the people carrying legally in the US that are going around shooting people?

And I believe I proposed the question of why size AND population aren’t compared ever? I think it’s because when you compare Russia or Mexico or Brazil to US, with much stricter the gun control the argument falls apart. You need to pick small population and or small isolated homogeneous populations to make your argument - if you think that’s legitimate keep at it.


> Where all the guns are, the shootings aren’t.

So there are shootings without guns?

Norway and France both have vastly fewer shooting deaths per year than the US.


Are you arguing crime or events? France and Norway beat US in events, gun control doesn’t seem to work there.

If you are talking crime, yes USA crime is higher - in the areas with more gun control. I’d argue the cause of the crime is our poor handling of drug and poverty and not focus on the tool used.

Guns have increased DRAMATICALLY since the crime highs of the 1990s, but crime has dropped to just above the lows of the 1960s.

You have ZERO data for causation of more guns equal more crime because we have opposite evidence.

So while I can’t say more guns EQUALS less crime - I can definitely say more guns hasn’t CAUSED more crime like you are saying.


I don't know what you mean by "events". More people get shot in the US.

There are obviously lots of confounding factors in relation to crime statistics in different areas of the USA. It's more revealing to look longitudinally at the positive effects of gun control legislation in e.g. the UK and Australia.


NYC has an impressively low homicide rate, if there is such a thing, and has become a very safe city in the last decade or two.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/new-york-citys-murder-rate-hit-...


Yes, so what?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: