I immediately thought the same thing when I read the study. Most of the glyphosate applications I see are not followed by tilling, discing or other forms of “hoeing.” The R plot is conspicuously absent and it doesn't explain why that choice was made (it explains many other decisions/choices) for the study.
A lack of difference in a W and R plot would have bolstered the findings and seems an obvious thing to test?
A lack of difference in a W and R plot would have bolstered the findings and seems an obvious thing to test?