> Also, you are stuck with the decision some developer made for your hash's efficiency trade-offs.
PersistentHashMaps are not slow. If you think they are, you can provide a custom defrecord with the same fields to the functions of the API and get the all perf benefits without breakage.
> leaving me with )]}]]}})) noise
Guess you never heard of paredit.
> Anyway, I would hesitate to call {} and [] an innovation.
PersistentHashMaps are not slow. If you think they are, you can provide a custom defrecord with the same fields to the functions of the API and get the all perf benefits without breakage.
> leaving me with )]}]]}})) noise
Guess you never heard of paredit.
> Anyway, I would hesitate to call {} and [] an innovation.
Whatever floats your boat man.