Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Headlines are written to draw attention, but this one is just so wrong I wonder if the writer of it felt the least bit unclean.

The final quote sums it up: "[...] some had found bugs in the Linux operating system but many of them didn't want to put the work into developing the exploit code that would be required to win the contest."

So all three machines had bugs that made them compromisable, yet no one actually WANTED to win by making linux look bad?



Most of the time in contests like these, the participants already know of the vulnerabilities in the OS that they can take advantage of. They work out the exploit code before the competition, which is why the MBA was able to go down in the first couple minutes of that round; the guy already knew what he was going to do. OSS is generally more secure not because it doesn't have vulnerabilities, but because known vulnerabilities are patched up more quickly. It's not about making linux look bad, it's about having to try to generate working code on the spot rather than being able to analyze and test it prior to the event.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: