Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | xd1936's commentslogin


well, that's interesting. the design it's a bit of a letdown - very very very low information density, lots of horizontal scrolling, a tab bar item dedicated to notifications (which one never changes) and another one dedicated to community (which is empty of content). Hopefully good data and good notifications make up for the poor design.

Oh, they finally launched it in Europe. Let’s see whether it’s as good as people say. :)

The argument that is pro-polyethylene plastic bags over cotton completely ignores the source: Renewable plants that are grown and harvested, vs. finite fossil fuels extracted from the Earth and refined.

> Instead of a simple blowing and sealing process, the cotton must be made into yarn, woven into fabric, prepared, dried, sized, dyed, and finished, which takes around 1,725 megajoules, around 3,050 times as much energy.

That conveniently ignores the drilling, extracting, transporting, refining, and transporting again to make "polyethylene resin".


> That conveniently ignores the drilling, extracting, transporting, refining, and transporting again to make "polyethylene resin".

It also ignores the energy requirements to grow the cotton. This isn't the gotcha you think it is.


The energy requirements for growing cotton being largely the sun, and a resource which makes up most of the universe (yes, I know water is several steps from hydrogen). ((And the tangentials like the fertilizers, dieslel etc.))

Compared to the energy requirements of petroleum based products: Incredible density and pressure acting on sufficient organic matter(thousands of times greater than growing cotton), on millenium time scales, then requiring several incredibly expensive and commoditization refining/distribution practices, and the end product is then ceremoniously burned off as poison or discarded into the aether.

It is 100 percent the "gotcha OP thought it is". However I do see/realize the fallacy you're pointing out in that the lesser of two evils is still evil.


I think the main point is that this post is not a good faith attempt to convince people otherwise. It's a shoddly researched opinion piece that has little to no merit as it ignores the complexities of producing either item.

True, I have fallen for the classic blunder:

(1) assuming a HN submission and the discussion around it is in good faith/informed on the topic

(2) Arguing about said topic and not the merits of the submission/discussion


The energy to make the cotton bags presumably also involves lots of drilling and extracting, at least currently.

If we used oil only for plastics it would probably last us 1000 years. By that time we'd figure out how to grow plastics.

We can make plastic from synthetic oil. Synthetic oil can be made from plants or from carbon captured from the air.

Broadly, I agree with your comment. I have seen a few experimental plastic drink bottles that claim to have a minimum percent produced from plants. It is a little bit insane to imagine the amount of chemical and energy gymnastics required to make plastic bottles from plants, but, hey, the big drinks companies are desparate not to lose PET bottles. To be clear: I am not defending this type of plastic! I am only pointing out that it does exist.

    > That conveniently ignores the drilling, extracting, transporting, refining, and transporting again to make "polyethylene resin".
This is really the key point! There are comparing apples to oranges.

Somewhat adjacent, in many rich countries, in the last 10 years there has been a big push to remove plastic drink straws. I think it might have worked. Initially, the designs and performance of wax coated paper straws were pretty terrible, but chemists and material scientists have been working hard to improve the product. I feel like paper-ish drink straws are here to stay.


Seconded. My only complaint is the bad buffering on the TV versions of the Nebula app. It starts out so low quality and takes forever to snap to 1080p, with no option to override quality, on symmetrical 2.5GBe.

Obviously YMMV, but I haven't had any issues like that, the quality of the videos is the same I get in the YouTube app. They take a few seconds longer to start though.

Similar in spirit to my site, https://stopcitingai.com


I just used Suncalc yesterday to add Sunrise/Sunset and Golden Hour to my PebbleOS NOAA Radar watchface[1]. Thank you for an amazing library; It's the first that I reach for every time I have a project with this need.

1. https://apps.repebble.com/2029ab9c84f946e1b125f8e0


I think they're talking about you making Cactus Needle be an engine to respond to user queries in Home Assistant by making a custom add-on.

https://www.home-assistant.io/voice_control/best_practices/

https://developers.home-assistant.io/docs/core/llm/

https://developers.home-assistant.io/docs/core/entity/conver...

Something like the Ollama integration:

https://www.home-assistant.io/integrations/ollama/


This is the way hey.com operates. It's nice.


Does anyone know _where_ these supposed 4,000 OBJ files are open-sourced? They don't seem to be in the Noto Emoji GitHub repo, nor linked anywhere in the article.


I'm wondering the same! How that article has no links is beyond me.


I also like that the article uses whatever system emoji you have, so everything is just showing apple emoji in text for me. All I see are a few 3D video renders of theirs.


I couldn't find anything easier.

Seems like they're trying to tease excitement for new emoji in the next Android release (there was also an earlier linkless post in May[1]), so I'm assuming they don't want anyone scooping them and will push to the Noto repo on or after the day of release.

Seems like the post really should at least have used a future tense for "handing over raw .OBJ files to the community".

[1] https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/platforms/android...


Maybe if the UX was nicer, you wouldn't need to write scrapers and parsers and could just use their site.


We don't need a bloated React framework to show a plaintext file with the fuel tank levels. It's NOAA, not Microsoft.


> We don't need a bloated React framework

Could have stopped there for 99% of websites


They're scraping to automatically update the wallpaper on their desktop. That's not something a website can do, even with fantastic UX.


"That's not something a website can do, even with fantastic UX."

Actually, I used to have a live-updating website AS MY BACKGROUND. Windows 98 and Me, website used AJAX and Comet to make it happen.

You used to be able to set websites as your desktop background.


I'm sure that was 100% secure, too. /s (I did the same thing back then.)


I think it's evoking "this little smiley face guy on a small monochrome screen", and not implying interactivity.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: