Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | wangii's commentslogin

Ted Chiang is a great Sci-Fi author, but his remark `GPT-3 and similar models as a "blurry JPEG of the Web"` was misleading at the best.

I share the view with others the term `consciousness` is not well-define yet, therefore his assessment is pointless. Maybe the real question to ask, if consciousness is merely an illusion at the macro level, when the observers not looking at the tech/implementation level deep enough, just like the term "intelligence" itself, might be more precisely captured by drifting amongst high dimensional manifold pitches.


Ted Chiang is a great SF author, but it's bizarre how much foggier and more obfuscated his thoughts about thinking machines got, once those machines became real. Same with several other SF authors.

The idea of software developers' job is to translate specification into codes is dying. Now what I'm experimenting is to make my developers into competing project manager and developers are replaced by AI. I think the key advantages of developers, junior or senior, are the process + data oriented style of thinking, therefore way ahead of people from many other domain.

I told my developers: the day of making good money by sitting in front of computer and typing is long gone. Go to the clients' scenes and build the whole thing from scratch, with some assistant from sales and domain experts. Now you are the PM.


what's the difference between Xilem and GPUI? GPUI is used in zed and pretty cool!


I tried to play with GPUI for making a scratchpad like app with zed and It was one of the most rough experiences out there. They mention it in the readme though that it has rough edges but I hope that they make in the future more easier to tinker around.


This set of components is a nice compliment to GPUI: https://github.com/kiruhq/wgpui-component

Xilem is more like Iced but with it's own patterns and underlying graphics library.


It's all about the right mind set at the very top level. At the beginning of the PC era, nobody would bet IBM to lose. Same in the dawn of internet, all money was on MS. so it happened to Nokia and Ericsson.

Google is a giant without a direction. The ads money is so good that it just doesn't have the gut to leave it on the table.


she's done pretty important work but since then obsessed with the vague term `spatial intelligence`. what does it mean? there isn't a clear definition in the piece. it seems very intuitive & fundamental but tbh not *rigorous*, nor insightful.

I bet it's a dead end.


It's rare for one person to achieve many things. Her ImageNet was certainly HUGE. But she is a researcher. I think the true power of researchers is to persist. I also often think that researchers are too much absorbed into their topics. But that is just their purpose.

It could be a dead end for sure. I just hope that someone figures out the `spatial` part for AIs and brings us closer to better ones.


I have only one problem w/ the S1: the creators just not have the guts to kill Mother or Father. Don't get me wrong, I like them but it could make the whole series more distant and cold.

on S2: a total disaster.


I expected to read some nash equilibrium like insight to demonstrate the inevitability of machines turning evil, but got a few headlines.


how is it better than https://github.com/boost-ext/sml ?

there are about 1 million c++ state machines, and sml happens to be the best, or one of them. how does yours differentiate?


I was about to complain about the use of strings in both libraries, both for the lack of type safety as well as the possible runtime allocation, but then I looked at the assembly for the sml example and there are no strings in the binary other than the obvious "send" one.

What exactly happened there? It looks like make_transition_table() is doing some serious magic. Or are the state transitions evaluated at compile-time given that there is no input in the example, and then the transition table gets compiled out?

Anyway, I think it would help OP's library to have some assembly output in the readme as well.


Looks like SML is using user-defined literals [0, 1] to effectively pre-process the string literal into state/event objects. Looks like the string itself is turned into a template parameter in the process and I believe those shouldn't show up in the compiled code (maybe unless there's some mangling-related thing going on?)

[0]: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/user_literal.html

[1]: https://github.com/boost-ext/sml/blob/f232328b49adf708737bef...


Thanks, I didn't know that was a thing.


could anyone give one sentence pitch why it's better than markdown files?


It's not quite in the same realm of use. The urtext files are more aware of other files, but they're also self-modifying.

Sort of like comparing plain HTML to PHP. Appear in similar places, with completely different guarantees.


Maybe it's b/c vast majority not doing well financially?!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: