Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | varispeed's commentslogin

> Somehow the US managed to break down all that good will in such a short amount of time

Because US administration is compromised. Putin says jump, Krasnov asks how high.


Apple should stop doing security by obscurity in the first place. People have no way finding out whether their phones have been compromised. Lockdown mode is just a cope mechanism for phones likely already compromised and there is no guarantee lockdown mode cannot be bypassed.

Apple hardware is inherently insecure and it is bizarre that Apple keeps burying their head in the sand.


Aren’t their devices the most secure on the mass market?

More than non-obscure phones, laptops, desktops… washing machines, robot vacuums, doorbells, you name it


> the most secure

Except for withholding iOS 18 security fixes when public exploits are fixed in iOS 26.


Even then. I'll take a leaky iOS 18 over pretty much any leaky Android or internet-connected TV or whatever.

iPhones are still the least bad option, for regular people who aren't planning to solder anything, select their boot loader on launch, or recompile a kernel.


My Pixel 8 Pro is more secure than your iOS 18 handset Apple don't care about.


Yes, but you can use anti-virus software on other platforms which can detect many threats.

Also just because others are not great, doesn't excuse Apple from being very much negligent.

I know many people who bought Apple products specifically because of the myth that they are secure. They were in fact mis sold. There is common thinking that no anti virus software = no viruses = secure among non technical crowd.


Nine women can't deliver a baby in a month.

I stopped paying attention to GPT-5.x releases, they seem to have been severely dumbed down.

constitutional amendment to criminalise corporate lobbying with severe penalties - including capital punishment and confiscation of entire corporation.

Why "lobbying" is not treated as corruption? This kind of corporate influence should be illegal.

Lobbying is literally half of what representative democracy is. First, you elect representatives to office. Then, you try to get them to do what you want. The latter is lobbying.

Of course, when money becomes a significant portion of how the second one happens, things can get complicated.


I’m not so sure. First the representatives are selected to be elected.

A significant portion of both of your suggested halves are “complicated” by money.


You could break it down further if you like, yes.

Everything is complicated by money. I wish we were better about shielding politics from money. So much about society in general is about money, it ain’t easy.


No, not “if I like”, everything touches money, and “it ain’t easy”.

Your breakdown was so simple, it was simply wrong.


It's not democracy when it's not the votes that determine what government does, but money.

Eventually it is the fault of voters to keep voting for the same people.

It's not democracy if one with the most money gets their way.

Well, money makes it a lot easier to get a message out to voters, and in a democracy voters are the ones ultimately in charge.

So in a democratic society where free speech exists there's only so much you can do to prevent that.


Technically because citizens are also allowed to lobby, but in practice only corporations get to play, so it becomes "legal bribing".

The environmental movement and labor movement are two examples where citizens organize to go up against corporate interests and win pretty regularly and durably.

Most of those folks would not call it lobbying because of the negative associations of the word. “We have activists, our opponents have lobbyists.” But it works the same way.

It is specifically protected in the First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

Emphasis mine.


You might want to look into the industry funding of environmental organizations and the decline of union membership before you decide with your whole heart.

Everybody lobbies for their own interests.

The issue that should rather worry you is that people

- don't delete their Meta/Facebook/WhatsApp/Instagram/Threads/... account because of this proposal,

- don't strongly urge friends and colleagues to do the same.


Because if someone tries to outlaw it, the lobbies will lobby very hard against it.

"Corporations are people, my friend"

Presidential Candidate Mitt Romney


Because freedom, and surveillance capitalism, have different effects depending on which side of the PR apparatus you find yourself on, and the laws that get passed are written by and for the industries and not crabs in the barrel voters who rely on them for income.

Power corrupts.


Generally, a lobbyist is someone who is paid to give money to lawmakers.

And for a lawmaker who is considering retirement, "become a lobbyist" is often the most lucrative career option.

Now who are you imagining will pass effective laws against lobbying?


This is probably protected free speech

You have the right to remain silent, but you must assert it verbally.

Dude, do you not know who's president in the US right now? Getting paid is easily the biggest* reason he ran!

Are you sure it was to get paid, not to avoid prosecution? It could be both among other reasons.

It doesn't matter as in this scale power ~= money ~= time so it's interchangeable, this prick can get paid in all of these commodities

Corruption is rife in the West. Wealth managers wine and dine with governments and essentially order policies that nobody voted for that continue to be developed regardless of which party won the elections. Same faces meet with new cohorts of politicians and continue to get their way whilst security services supposed to protect democracy hide their heads in the sand.

See things like Digital ID, censorship, surveillance - nobody voted for this, but certain wealth managers want this to happen and so it takes priority over issues that actually people would want to be resolved (housing, healthcare to name a few).


I am in Germany. Apparently very democratic place. However nothing happens what people voted for. There is always few groups advertising affordable living in Munich. Never happened. Every year the rent climbs to new never seen high. The system very obviously does not work as advertised. The conspiracist in me however thinks, that the system works as intended.

That's not what you voted for. Homeowners, on the other hand, did vote for it. In most countries they're the majority, and they're better at mobilizing politically. Autocracies are probably less likely to have the same issue because the leaders are petrified of a revolt from the lower classes. In a democracy, the majority (homeowners) will vote away your money.

i.o.w. the system works as intended

> There is always few groups advertising affordable living in Munich. Never happened. Every year the rent climbs to new never seen high. The system very obviously does not work as advertised.

Or the problem is harder then to be solved with just wanting to solve it?


The politicians enacted the policies requested. The problem is that the policies don't work and even have the opposite of the intended effect at times. Democracy divides power to (try to) prevent autocracy. It doesn't make most people smart so doing dumb things is still on the table and still has bad consequences.

> There is always few groups advertising affordable living in Munich. Never happened. Every year the rent climbs to new never seen high.

Well your population grows trough migration, your land does not and your construction doesn't match either in a long term inflationary environment with every incentive pointing in the continuation of that path.

See also Canada, Ireland, UK, Netherlands, Australia, etc, etc


Germany is a place of dense housing, so it's about construction more than land

The purpose of a system is what it does.

"As intended" is something that doesn't exist at all.


Imagine what this could be used for when a fascist/communist/genocidal maniac gets elected and make full use of such data to single out groups of people for persecution.

Mere proposals of such a thing should be illegal and people engaged in development imprisoned and banned from holding public office.


+1, democracies really need to start establishing some serious red lines that are not to be crossed. Mass surveillance of citizens by any means (including purchasing it from corporations or obtaining it from other governments). Corporations should not have the rights of citizens, monopolies should be dismantled, and politicians should be able to be ejected and tried for crimes when they're committing them in office (qualified immunity should not only not be an excuse - but we should hold anyone working for the government to a HIGHER STANDARD, not a lower one!). As a start!

You mean when Justin Trudeau froze the bank accounts of protesters? It's not even something you have to imagine, it already happened in Canada.

> in a lot of the identity verification and age gating

This won't change anything. Likely will just open a market for trading verified accounts and spam will continue.


I think that could get shot down real quick though.

Accounts/identities that are known to have been shared could be flagged as stolen and now anyone who tries to use it gets burned.

Then the question is, what happens to the poor guy whose identity was stolen? As it is I already can't view half the sites on the internet due to endless captcha loops.


Not necessarily stolen. People desperate for money could be "fronting" the accounts.

yes that too. recently there was a post on the red site saying that they thought the invite tree system worked well.

https://abyss.fish/tree-style_invite_systems_reduce_AI_slop


Many of those are self-reporting, anyway. It's not there to stop bots.

Why people run these? What does it do and what could be the use?

I install it and then what?


1) install nanoclaw in docker 2) ??? 3) profit

More seriously, set it up as you would a junior employee with a high quality getting started guide, guardrails, and clear feedback loops that it's doing tasks correctly (otherwise it will just suck). Then delegate tasks to it, start simple and grow in complexity as it demonstrates it does a good job on the simple tasks.

What role it does for you depends on your business, and what is best fit for automation. Purely digital roles with good feedback loops are the ones I focus on.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: