Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | unixhero's commentslogin

Aha an Arch Linux user

Agreed it is amazing

No logically, it would be that Blackrock did not pursue its business any further.

More lovely Italian, Belgian and French food in Australia

Here is an idea though: What about the free flow of people???


Some sort of worker mobility has been decided, there's going to be quotas I imagine.

I do not see a free flow of people happening, it would be viewed very negatively in Australia.


Perhaps if you read the article you'd see the idea was included. Not free flow because that's silly, however there are rumored improved working rights.

I'm afraid the deal would be too one-sided. There's far more Europeans wanting to live and work in Australia than the opposite. That's unfortunate, I wouldn't mind a bit of sun.

You mean like visas, readily available from AUS to the EU?

From EU and EEA to Australia.

So we can get out

Citizen track


it’s part of the agreement

How? Labour mobility sounds like easier visa applications. Free flow would mean you can go from one place to another without a passport (you can do this currently within the EU with a EU ID.)

Well it makes sense to be able to do this within the EU with an EU ID, however Australia isn't in the EU and also doesn't have an EU ID.

I just cancelled my paid Plus subscription. I do not want to give away money.


Which is why I never buy ATI cards ever again.


Good, they were bought out in 2006 and no longer exist.

I assume you mean AMD, and I also assume you didn't actually read the article.

The AMDGPU driver was never designed for cards before Polaris (GCN 1.4). The specific card in question, a R9 M380, was released in early 2015, and in 3 months, will be 10 years old.

The bug listed only exhibits itself on Macs, which requires a custom firmware to cope with the oddities in how Macintels boot and function, and pre-Polaris cards especially on a Mac are not well tested on AMDGPU. The bug does not happen on real x86 machines.

At no point can AMD be blamed for any of this, but Apple most certainly can (refusal to ship a compliant UEFI firmware, and instead shipping the nightmare that Macintels used during their existence).


For what it's worth, Apple's UEFI firmware is likely not compliant because they began using EFI before it was standardized. You can blame them for not updating it later, but I can understand why they didn't; it was working.


They were using OpenFirmware, the standard that EFI is built on, but their first x86 CPU was a Core 1 iirc, which had shipped with a UEFI on real PCs.


Are you sure their early EFI contained anything from OpenFirmware, except for conceptual inspiration, maybe?


Intel wanted to rip OpenFirmware off and wanted to EEE it without paying lip service to Sun et al.

It isn't an accident that both, for example, use Forth.


That's why I've asked? Where is the FORTH in EFI, or any UEFI, for that matter?


Look up "UEFI shell" for your vendor. Sometimes this is an unlisted F key, sometimes its as simple as selecting it as which OS you want to boot, sometimes it will happen automatically if no boot device is discovered, sometimes you must supply it as a bootx64.efi from the vendor (or from Tianocore).

Just because UEFI is a standard doesn't mean all the vendors don't smoke crack.


That's only a shell/repl, implementing a DSL for boot-related stuff. It isn't implemented in FORTH, it does not execute or understand FORTH, or use it for anything. It's not there.

It just occupies a similar role in a similar place, of what some FORTHs on some systems once did. Mainly OpenBoot on SUNs and some PPC Apples, while having nothing from their internals.

Having the ability to type some commands in your firmware/BIOS/UEFI, like it has been the case on Sparcs by SUN, PPC Macintosh by Apple, or the OLPC doesn't make it a FORTH.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Firmware


Hydrogen gas-stations have blown up in the past https://www.nrk.no/norge/eksplosjon-ved-hydrogenstasjon-1.14...


Thanks for an insightful comment! I have two university degrees in Economics and have never heard of reactive diffusion field pricing engines until today.


There's an interesting arxiv paper here, I haven't read it in depth but shows some academic activity in the area at least

https://arxiv.org/html/2502.07071v2


Me too


But teams already have planner. No Microsoft zealot organizations are using Trello anymore


This is not for people


Yeah but corporations who operate teams will want to stay in their licensing walled garden regardless of it being humans or agents.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: